Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/116337
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Referrals to a tertiary hospital: A window into clinical management issues in functional gastrointestinal disorders
Author: Linedale, E.
Shahzad, M.
Kellie, A.
Mikocka-Walus, A.
Gibson, P.
Andrews, J.
Citation: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Open, 2017; 1(3):84-91
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Inc.
Issue Date: 2017
ISSN: 0815-9319
2397-9070
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Ecushla C Linedale, Muhammad A Shahzad, Andrew R Kellie, Antonina Mikocka-Walus, Peter R Gibson and Jane M Andrews
Abstract: Background and Aim: To investigate the quality of and reasons for referrals of patients with likely functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) and explore patients' experience of clinical management. Methods: A cross sectional, mixed-methods study was undertaken. Referrals (July 2013-2015) to one gastroenterology outpatient department triaged as "likely FGID", the referred patients and their referring primary healthcare providers were examined. Results: A total of 69% of patients reported not yet receiving an initial diagnosis, 52% reported persistent/distressing symptoms or reduced quality of life, 24% feared missed or worsening pathology, and 35% were seeking repeat specialist consultation. Most patients were dissatisfied (40%) or only partially satisfied (36%) with current management. Dissatisfaction was significantly related to the lack of provision of a diagnosis and effective treatment options (P < 0.001). Referral quality was poor and with the reason for referral clearly communicated in only 25%. Common referral reasons included repeat presentations (n = 32), diagnostic uncertainty (n = 19), to ensure nothing is missed (n = 19), patient request (n = 17), no response to treatment (n = 16), and to allay patient fears (n = 14). A total of 28/60 primary healthcare providers were confident that their patient had a FGID, yet sought confirmation (n = 16), second opinion (n = 8), or advice (n = 4). Conclusion: Current management of FGID in usual care is suboptimal, as evidenced by the tertiary referral load, patient dissatisfaction, and the lack of provision of diagnoses and effective treatment options. Some clinicians lack confidence in effectively identifying and managing these conditions. Resources and supports to equip and assist clinicians to identify and manage FGID successfully may enhance patient care.
Keywords: Functional gastrointestinal disorders; irritable bowel syndrome; management; primary care; tertiary care
Rights: © 2017 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
RMID: 0030103373
DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12015
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_116337.pdfPublished version569.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.