Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/116337
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLinedale, E.en
dc.contributor.authorShahzad, M.en
dc.contributor.authorKellie, A.en
dc.contributor.authorMikocka-Walus, A.en
dc.contributor.authorGibson, P.en
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, J.en
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Open, 2017; 1(3):84-91en
dc.identifier.issn0815-9319en
dc.identifier.issn2397-9070en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/116337-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aim: To investigate the quality of and reasons for referrals of patients with likely functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) and explore patients' experience of clinical management. Methods: A cross sectional, mixed-methods study was undertaken. Referrals (July 2013-2015) to one gastroenterology outpatient department triaged as "likely FGID", the referred patients and their referring primary healthcare providers were examined. Results: A total of 69% of patients reported not yet receiving an initial diagnosis, 52% reported persistent/distressing symptoms or reduced quality of life, 24% feared missed or worsening pathology, and 35% were seeking repeat specialist consultation. Most patients were dissatisfied (40%) or only partially satisfied (36%) with current management. Dissatisfaction was significantly related to the lack of provision of a diagnosis and effective treatment options (P < 0.001). Referral quality was poor and with the reason for referral clearly communicated in only 25%. Common referral reasons included repeat presentations (n = 32), diagnostic uncertainty (n = 19), to ensure nothing is missed (n = 19), patient request (n = 17), no response to treatment (n = 16), and to allay patient fears (n = 14). A total of 28/60 primary healthcare providers were confident that their patient had a FGID, yet sought confirmation (n = 16), second opinion (n = 8), or advice (n = 4). Conclusion: Current management of FGID in usual care is suboptimal, as evidenced by the tertiary referral load, patient dissatisfaction, and the lack of provision of diagnoses and effective treatment options. Some clinicians lack confidence in effectively identifying and managing these conditions. Resources and supports to equip and assist clinicians to identify and manage FGID successfully may enhance patient care.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityEcushla C Linedale, Muhammad A Shahzad, Andrew R Kellie, Antonina Mikocka-Walus, Peter R Gibson and Jane M Andrewsen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Inc.en
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.en
dc.subjectFunctional gastrointestinal disorders; irritable bowel syndrome; management; primary care; tertiary careen
dc.titleReferrals to a tertiary hospital: A window into clinical management issues in functional gastrointestinal disordersen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030103373en
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jgh3.12015en
dc.identifier.pubid371687-
pubs.library.collectionMedicine publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS06en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidLinedale, E. [0000-0002-8635-6731]en
dc.identifier.orcidMikocka-Walus, A. [0000-0003-4864-3956]en
dc.identifier.orcidAndrews, J. [0000-0001-7960-2650]en
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_116337.pdfPublished version569.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.