Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/116535
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHeath, M.-
dc.contributor.authorBurdon, P.-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationAlternative Law Journal�, 2017; 42(3):190-194-
dc.identifier.issn1037-969X-
dc.identifier.issn2398-9084-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/116535-
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental destruction and climate change are driving new waves of environmental activism. In response, govern- ments in several Australian states have enacted legislation designed to penalise and silence political protest. This article analyses Tasmania’s anti-protest laws and considers how the United Nations and scholars have reacted to them. We argue that protest suppression laws such as these reflect a neoliberal rationality which conceptualises society in market terms. This mode of thinking perceives protest as market interference rather than civic participation. Accordingly, anti- protest laws seek to secure the rights and interests of corporations to unimpeded market access.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMary Heath, Peter Burdon-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherLegal Service Bulletin Co-Operative Ltd.-
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2017-
dc.subjectProtest; dissent; environmental activism; climate change action; environmental NGOs-
dc.titleSilencing of activism in Australian law-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1037969X17730193-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBurdon, P. [0000-0003-0967-4987]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Law publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_116535.pdfAccepted version820.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.