Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/117027
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMunn, Z.-
dc.contributor.authorPearson, A.-
dc.contributor.authorJordan, Z.-
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, F.-
dc.contributor.authorPilkington, D.-
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, A.-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 2016; 47(4):329-336-
dc.identifier.issn1939-8654-
dc.identifier.issn1876-7982-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/117027-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can experience anxiety and claustrophobia. A multimethod action research study was conducted to determine how patient care was currently being delivered in an MRI department and to determine whether this could be improved. Methods: This action research study used both quantitative and qualitative methods. Changes were introduced into the department after baseline data collection to address areas for improvement. A survey was conducted of patients to establish their level of satisfaction and/or anxiety and to determine whether this improved during the course of the project. Staff practice was qualitatively observed over the course of the project and observations recorded in a field diary. Finally, focus groups were held with staff. Results: The project resulted in improved satisfaction and lower anxiety for patients, and increased the amount of patients receiving information compared with the results of a baseline survey. However, these findings were not statistically significant. Among staff, qualitative observations portrayed a renewed focus on the patient in MRI including changes in their actions such as increased use of touch, improved communication, and focused efforts to maintain privacy. Conclusions: This study was able to achieve a change in practice through an action research cycle in a MRI department. Over the course of the project, improvements were made to the department, and radiographers changed the way they acted and interacted with patients.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityZachary Munn, Alan Pearson, Zoe Jordan, Fred Murphy, Diana Pilkington and Amanda Anderson-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherCanadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists-
dc.rights© 2016 Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2016.04.007-
dc.subjectMRI; action research; patient experience; anxiety-
dc.titleAddressing the patient experience in a magnetic resonance imaging department: final results from an action research study-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmir.2016.04.007-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidMunn, Z. [0000-0002-7091-5842]-
dc.identifier.orcidJordan, Z. [0000-0001-9125-1582]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.