Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/117465
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Responses of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary health-care services to continuous quality improvement initiatives
Author: Larkins, S.
Woods, C.
Matthews, V.
Thompson, S.
Schierhout, G.
Mitropoulos, M.
Patrao, T.
Panzera, A.
Bailie, R.
Citation: Frontiers in Public Health, 2016; 3:288-1-288-9
Publisher: Frontiers Media
Issue Date: 2016
ISSN: 2296-2565
2296-2565
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Sarah Larkins, Cindy E. Woods, Veronica Matthews, Sandra C. Thompson, Gill Schierhout, Maxwell Mitropoulos, Tania Patrao,Annette Panzera and Ross Stewart Bailie
Abstract: Background: Indigenous primary health-care (PHC) services participating in continuous quality improvement (CQI) cycles show varying patterns of performance over time. Understanding this variation is essential to scaling up and sustaining quality improvement initiatives. The aim of this study is to examine trends in quality of care for services participating in the ABCD National Research Partnership and describe patterns of change over time and examine health service characteristics associated with positive and negative trends in quality of care. Setting and participants: PHC services providing care for Indigenous people in urban, rural, and remote northern Australia that had completed at least three annual audits of service delivery for at least one aspect of care (n = 73). Methods/design: Longitudinal clinical audit data from use of four clinical audit tools (maternal health, child health, preventive health, Type 2 diabetes) between 2005 and 2013 were analyzed. Health center performance was classified into six patterns of change over time: consistent high improvement (positive), sustained high performance (positive), decline (negative), marked variability (negative), consistent low performance (negative), and no specific increase or decrease (neutral). Backwards stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations between health service characteristics and positive or negative trends in quality of care. Results: Trends in quality of care varied widely between health services across the four audit tools. Regression analyses of health service characteristics revealed no consistent statistically significant associations of population size, remoteness, governance model, or accreditation status with positive or negative trends in quality of care. Conclusion: The variable trends in quality of care as reflected by CQI audit tools do not appear to be related to easily measurable health service characteristics. This points to the need for a deeper or more nuanced understanding of factors that moderate the effect of CQI on health service performance for the purpose of strengthening enablers and overcoming barriers to improvement.
Keywords: Aboriginal; Australia; best practice; Indigenous health services; primary health care; quality improvement; quality of care; Torres Strait Islander
Rights: © 2016 Larkins, Woods, Matthews, Thompson, Schierhout, Mitropoulos, Patrao, Panzera and Bailie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00288
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/545267
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1078927
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1062377
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FT100100087
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00288
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_117465.pdfPublished version543.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.