Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/118112
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLopriore, S.en
dc.contributor.authorLe Couteur, A.en
dc.contributor.authorEkberg, K.en
dc.contributor.authorEkberg, S.en
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Nursing, 2019; 28(1-2):330-339en
dc.identifier.issn0962-1067en
dc.identifier.issn1365-2702en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/118112-
dc.description.abstractAims and objectives: To explore the accomplishment of physical examination on a health helpline. By focusing on the ways in which callers are asked to examine themselves and report information to nurses, we aim to provide insight into how physical examination at a distance is achieved. Background: Physical examination is a routine feature of healthcare encounters. In face‐to‐face settings, patients are subject to professional scrutiny through talk, touch and observation. Health professionals working on helplines face challenges in assessing signs of illness when they do not have physical access to patients. Design and Methods: Conversation analysis was used to explore sequences of interaction between nurses and callers that involved physical examination. Analysis: Analysis examined how physical examination was routinely accomplished in a helpline environment. Nurses typically guided callers in self‐examination by drawing on gross categorisations that required reporting of large‐scale characteristics of symptoms (e.g., whether a body part looked “normal”). Physical examination was also regularly accomplished by nurses through two‐component speaking turns: a prefacing component that involved instructions about self‐examination; followed by a second component that included an information‐soliciting question. These practices resulted in callers successfully accomplishing physical examination, despite their lack of professional medical knowledge. Conclusions: This study identifies the communicative practices used by nurses to accomplish physical examination in helpline calls. Such practices involved asking questions that sought general, rather than specific, information and the prefacing of questions with simple instructions on how to undertake self‐examination. Relevance to clinical practice: Previous research indicates that physical examination in telehealth can be challenging, particularly in environments where clinicians need patients to examine themselves. This study identifies how nurses on a helpline manage this challenge. The findings highlight ways in which nurses can recruit patients to undertake tasks that would typically be undertaken by clinicians in physically co‐present consultations.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityStefanie Lopriore, Amanda LeCouteur, Katie Ekberg, Stuart Ekbergen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsen
dc.rights© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en
dc.subjectCommunication; conversation analysis; self-examination; telenursingen
dc.title“You'll have to be my eyes and ears”: a conversation analytic study of physical examination on a health helplineen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030097266en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocn.14638en
dc.identifier.pubid436713-
pubs.library.collectionPsychology publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS10en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidLe Couteur, A. [0000-0001-6801-1230]en
dc.identifier.orcidEkberg, K. [0000-0002-8237-1459]en
dc.identifier.orcidEkberg, S. [0000-0001-8837-7440]en
Appears in Collections:Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.