Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/118325
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: The prognostic impact of consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) and its predictive effects for bevacizumab benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer: molecular analysis of the AGITG MAX clinical trial
Author: Mooi, J.
Wirapati, P.
Asher, R.
Lee, C.
Savas, P.
Price, T.
Townsend, A.
Hardingham, J.
Buchanan, D.
Williams, D.
Tejpar, S.
Mariadason, J.
Tebbutt, N.
Citation: Annals of Oncology, 2018; 29(11):2240-2246
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Issue Date: 2018
ISSN: 0923-7534
1569-8041
Statement of
Responsibility: 
J.K. Mooi, P. Wirapati, R. Asher, C.K. Lee, P. Savas, T.J. Price, A. Townsend, J. Hardingham, D. Buchanan, D. Williams, S. Tejpar, J.M. Mariadason, N.C. Tebbutt
Abstract: Background: The consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) is a transcriptome-based classification of colorectal cancer (CRC) initially described in early-stage cohorts, but the associations of CMS with treatment outcomes in the metastatic setting are yet to be established. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of CMS classification and its predictive effects for bevacizumab benefit in metastatic CRC by correlative analysis of the AGITG MAX trial. Patients and Methods: The MAX trial previously reported improved progression-free survival (PFS) for the addition of bevacizumab (B) to chemotherapy [capecitabine (C)±mitomycin (M)]. Archival primary tumours from 237 patients (50% of trial population) underwent gene expression profiling and classification into CMS groups. CMS groups were correlated to PFS and overall survival (OS). The interaction of CMS with treatment was assessed by proportional hazards model. Results: The distribution of CMS in MAX were CMS1 18%, CMS2 47%, CMS3 12%, CMS4 23%. CMS1 was the predominant subtype in right-sided primary tumours, while CMS2 was the predominant subtype in left-sided. CMS was prognostic of OS (P = 0.008), with CMS2 associated with the best outcome and CMS1 the worst. CMS remained an independent prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis. There was a significant interaction between CMS and treatment (P-interaction = 0.03), for PFS, with hazard ratios (95% CI) for CB+CBM versus C arms in CMS1, 2, 3 and 4: 0.83 (0.43-1.62), 0.50 (0.33-0.76), 0.31 (0.13-0.75) and 1.24 (0.68-2.25), respectively. Conclusions: This exploratory study found that CMS stratified OS outcomes in metastatic CRC regardless of first-line treatment, with prognostic effects of CMS groups distinct from those previously reported in early-stage cohorts. In CMS associations with treatment, CMS2 and possibly CMS3 tumours may preferentially benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to first-line capecitabine-based chemotherapy, compared with other CMS groups. Validation of these findings in additional cohorts is warranted.
Keywords: Consensus molecular subtypes; metastatic colorectal cancer; bevacizumab; prognostic; predictive; biomarkers
Rights: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
RMID: 0030099709
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy410
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1048088
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1046092
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.