Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/118794
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: From talk to action: policy stakeholders, appropriateness, and selective disinvestment
Author: Paprica, P.
Culyer, A.
Elshaug, A.
Peffer, J.
Sandoval, G.
Citation: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2015; 31(4):236-240
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Issue Date: 2015
ISSN: 0266-4623
1471-6348
Statement of
Responsibility: 
P. Alison Paprica, Anthony J. Culyer, Adam G. Elshaug, Justin Peffer and Guillermo A. Sandoval
Abstract: Objectives: There is widespread commitment—at least in principle—to “evidence-informed” clinical practice and policy development in health care. The intention is that only “appropriate” care ought to be delivered at public expense. Although the rationale for an appropriateness agenda is widely endorsed, and methods have been proposed for addressing it, few published studies exist of contemporary policy initiatives which have actually led to successful disinvestment. Our objective was to explore whether the direct involvement of policy stakeholders could advance appropriateness and disinvestment. Methods: Several collaborative engagements with policy stakeholders were undertaken to adapt and combine conceptual and empirical material related to appropriateness and disinvestment from the literature to create tools and processes for use in Canada and the province of Ontario in particular. Results: By combining inputs from the literature with colloquial evidence from policy stakeholders, a definition of appropriateness was developed and, importantly, endorsed by all the provincial and territorial ministers of health in Canada. Second, a reassessment framework was successfully implemented for identifying priorities for selective disinvestment. Conclusions: When scientific evidence was combined with colloquial evidence from policy stakeholders, progress was made on the design and successful implementation of policies for appropriateness and disinvestment.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Medicine
Unnecessary Procedures
Policy Making
Ontario
Rights: © Cambridge University Press 2015. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462315000392
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_118794.pdfPublished version106.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.