Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/118867
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLoch, A.en
dc.contributor.authorGregg, D.en
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.citationWater Resources Research, 2019; 54(11):8813-8827en
dc.identifier.issn1944-7973en
dc.identifier.issn1944-7973en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/118867-
dc.description.abstractTransaction costs are fundamental to implementing, evaluating, and monitoring public policy/programs for social, economic, and/or environmental welfare. Empirical accounting for transaction costs helps identify and evaluate adaptive public policy or program arrangements that improve future institutional choices under uncertainty. However, examples of empirical transaction cost studies are few, due largely to persistent measurement challenges and limits to transaction cost comprehension. A lack of studies limits both insights into the importance of transaction costs in institutional design and validation of theories surrounding cost trajectories over time under different institutional arrangements. In this paper we apply time series analysis to a unique database of public salinity management program transaction costs in Australia's Murray‐Darling Basin. Our study provides insights into the role of transaction costs in institutional efficiency and on empirical approaches to considering relationships between observed transaction cost trajectories and the efficiency of associated institutions. Our results indicate that the Murray‐Darling Basin salinity management program succeeded in generating persistent declines in transaction costs and river salinity levels over time. We suggest some possible reasons for this that are associated with institutional design and reflect on what these findings may mean for other jurisdictions.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAdam Loch, Daniel Greggen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Unionen
dc.rights© 2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.en
dc.subjectSalinity management; transaction costs; empirical analysisen
dc.titleSalinity management in the Murray-Darling Basin: a transaction cost studyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030100165en
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2018WR022912en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE150100328en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE150100328en
dc.identifier.pubid440581-
pubs.library.collectionCivil and Environmental Engineering publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS10en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidLoch, A. [0000-0002-1436-8768]en
dc.identifier.orcidGregg, D. [0000-0002-2308-0790]en
Appears in Collections:Civil and Environmental Engineering publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.