Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/119453
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMellin, C.-
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, S.-
dc.contributor.authorAnthony, K.R.N.-
dc.contributor.authorBrown, S.C.-
dc.contributor.authorCaley, M.J.-
dc.contributor.authorJohns, K.A.-
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, K.-
dc.contributor.authorPuotinen, M.-
dc.contributor.authorThompson, A.-
dc.contributor.authorWolff, N.H.-
dc.contributor.authorFordham, D.A.-
dc.contributor.authorMacNeil, M.A.-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationGlobal Change Biology, 2019; 25(7):2431-2445-
dc.identifier.issn1354-1013-
dc.identifier.issn1365-2486-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/119453-
dc.description.abstractIn the face of increasing cumulative effects from human and natural disturbances, sustaining coral reefs will require a deeper understanding of the drivers of coral resilience in space and time. Here we develop a high-resolution, spatially explicit model of coral dynamics on Australia's Great Barrier Reef (GBR). Our model accounts for biological, ecological and environmental processes, as well as spatial variation in water quality and the cumulative effects of coral diseases, bleaching, outbreaks of crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster cf. solaris), and tropical cyclones. Our projections reconstruct coral cover trajectories between 1996 and 2017 over a total reef area of 14,780 km2 , predicting a mean annual coral loss of -0.67%/year mostly due to the impact of cyclones, followed by starfish outbreaks and coral bleaching. Coral growth rate was the highest for outer shelf coral communities characterized by digitate and tabulate Acropora spp. and exposed to low seasonal variations in salinity and sea surface temperature, and the lowest for inner-shelf communities exposed to reduced water quality. We show that coral resilience (defined as the net effect of resistance and recovery following disturbance) was negatively related to the frequency of river plume conditions, and to reef accessibility to a lesser extent. Surprisingly, reef resilience was substantially lower within no-take marine protected areas, however this difference was mostly driven by the effect of water quality. Our model provides a new validated, spatially explicit platform for identifying the reefs that face the greatest risk of biodiversity loss, and those that have the highest chances to persist under increasing disturbance regimes.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityCamille Mellin, Samuel Matthews, Kenneth R.N. Anthony, Stuart C. Brown, M. Julian Caley, Kerryn A. Johns, Kate Osborne, Marjetta Puotinen, Angus Thompson, Nicholas H. Wolff, Damien A. Fordham, M. Aaron MacNeil-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons-
dc.rights© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14625-
dc.subjectAcanthaster-
dc.subjectbleaching-
dc.subjectcoral reefs-
dc.subjectcrown-of-thorns-
dc.subjectcyclones-
dc.subjectwater quality-
dc.titleSpatial resilience of the Great Barrier Reef under cumulative disturbance impacts-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/gcb.14625-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE140100701-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidMellin, C. [0000-0002-7369-2349]-
dc.identifier.orcidBrown, S.C. [0000-0002-0669-1418]-
dc.identifier.orcidFordham, D.A. [0000-0003-2137-5592]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Environment Institute publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.