Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/119870
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVoskoboinik, A.en
dc.contributor.authorKalman, E.en
dc.contributor.authorPlunkett, G.en
dc.contributor.authorKnott, J.en
dc.contributor.authorMoskovitch, J.en
dc.contributor.authorSanders, P.en
dc.contributor.authorKistler, P.en
dc.contributor.authorKalman, J.en
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2019; 284:33-37en
dc.identifier.issn0167-5273en
dc.identifier.issn1874-1754en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/119870-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND:Due to barriers to accessing timely elective electrical cardioversion (CV) for persistent AF (PeAF), we adopted a policy of instructing patients to present directly to the Emergency Department (ED) for CV. OBJECTIVE:We compare a strategy of Emergency CV (ED-CV) versus Elective CV (EL-CV) for treatment of symptomatic PeAF. METHODS:Between 2014 and 7, we evaluated 150 patients undergoing CV for PeAF. ED-CV patients were provided an AF action plan for recurrent symptoms and advised to present to ED within 36 h. EL-CV patients followed standard care, including cardiologist referral and placement on an elective hospital waiting list. Follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS:We included 75 consecutive ED-CV patients and 75 consecutive EL-CV patients. ED-CV patients had a significantly shorter median AF duration prior to CV (1 day vs 3 months; p < 0.01) and less overall AF-related symptoms at 12 months (modified EHRA symptom score ≥ 2a in 44% vs 72%; p = 0.005). Time to next AF recurrence was longer in the ED-CV group (295 ± 15 vs 245 ± 15 days; logrank p = 0.001), as was time to AF ablation referral (314 ± 13 vs 276 ± 15 days; logrank p = 0.01). Baseline LA area was similar (ED-CV 27 ± 4 cm2 vs EL-CV 28 ± 11 cm2; p = 0.67), however EL-CV had larger atria at follow-up (31 ± 8 vs 26 ± 6 cm2; p = 0.01). There were no complications in either group. CONCLUSION:ED-CV is an acceptable strategy for symptomatic PeAF. In addition to reduced time spent in AF and improved symptom scores, this strategy may also slow progression of atrial substrate & delay onset of next AF episode.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAleksandr Voskoboinik, Elana Kalman, George Plunkett, Jonathan Knott, Jeremy Moskovitch, Prashanthan Sanders, Peter M. Kistler, Jonathan M. Kalmanen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rights© 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.en
dc.subjectAtrial fibrillation; Atrial remodelling; Electrical cardioversion; Left atriumen
dc.titleA comparison of early versus delayed elective electrical cardioversion for recurrent episodes of persistent atrial fibrillation: a multi-center studyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030102596en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.068en
dc.identifier.pubid447564-
pubs.library.collectionMedicine publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS10en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidSanders, P. [0000-0003-3803-8429]en
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.