Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDuval, M.en
dc.contributor.authorBahain, J.-.J.en
dc.contributor.authorBartz, M.en
dc.contributor.authorFalguères, C.en
dc.contributor.authorGuilarte, V.en
dc.contributor.authorMorena, D.en
dc.contributor.authorTissoux, H.en
dc.contributor.authordel Val, M.en
dc.contributor.authorVoinchet, P.en
dc.contributor.authorArnold, L.en
dc.identifier.citationAncient TL, 2017; 35(1):11-19en
dc.description.abstractMore than 30 years after the first Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) dating application to optically bleached quartz grains by Yokoyama et al. (1985), the absence of standardization for reporting methodology and age results remains an obstacle for the development and recognition of the ESR dating method within the Quaternary scientific community. To overcome this issue, the present work proposes some basic guidelines which should hopefully be useful not only for the ESR dating community, but also for any potential reviewers who may not be familiar with the specificities of this field.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMathieu Duval, Jean-Jacques Bahain, Melanie Bartz, Christophe Falguères, Verónica Guilarte, Davinia Moreno, Hélène Tissoux, Miren del Val, Pierre Voinchet, Lee J. Arnolden
dc.publisherEast Carolina Universityen © 2017-19 Ancient TL All rights reserved.en
dc.subjectElectron spin resonance (ESR) dating; quartz grains; aluminium centre; titanium centre; equivalent dose; dose rateen
dc.titleDefining minimum reporting requirements for ESR dating of optically bleached quartz grainsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
pubs.library.collectionIPAS publicationsen
dc.identifier.orcidArnold, L. [0000-0001-9603-3824]en
Appears in Collections:IPAS publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.