Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/120252
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHahn, A.en
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, K.en
dc.contributor.authorCongdon, J.en
dc.contributor.authorHoang, J.en
dc.contributor.authorMcMillan, N.en
dc.contributor.authorScully, E.en
dc.contributor.authorYong, J.en
dc.contributor.authorElie, J.en
dc.contributor.authorSturdy, C.en
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Cognition, 2017; 20(4):639-654en
dc.identifier.issn1435-9448en
dc.identifier.issn1435-9456en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/120252-
dc.description.abstractChickadees produce a multi-note chick-a-dee call in multiple socially relevant contexts. One component of this call is the D note, which is a low-frequency and acoustically complex note with a harmonic-like structure. In the current study, we tested black-capped chickadees on a between-category operant discrimination task using vocalizations with acoustic structures similar to black-capped chickadee D notes, but produced by various songbird species, in order to examine the role that phylogenetic distance plays in acoustic perception of vocal signals. We assessed the extent to which discrimination performance was influenced by the phylogenetic relatedness among the species producing the vocalizations and by the phylogenetic relatedness between the subjects' species (black-capped chickadees) and the vocalizers' species. We also conducted a bioacoustic analysis and discriminant function analysis in order to examine the acoustic similarities among the discrimination stimuli. A previous study has shown that neural activation in black-capped chickadee auditory and perceptual brain regions is similar following the presentation of these vocalization categories. However, we found that chickadees had difficulty discriminating between forward and reversed black-capped chickadee D notes, a result that directly corresponded to the bioacoustic analysis indicating that these stimulus categories were acoustically similar. In addition, our results suggest that the discrimination between vocalizations produced by two parid species (chestnut-backed chickadees and tufted titmice) is perceptually difficult for black-capped chickadees, a finding that is likely in part because these vocalizations contain acoustic similarities. Overall, our results provide evidence that black-capped chickadees' perceptual abilities are influenced by both phylogenetic relatedness and acoustic structure.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAllison H. Hahn, Kimberley A. Campbell, Jenna V. Congdon, John Hoang, Neil McMillan, Erin N. Scully, Joshua J.H. Yong, Julie E. Elie, Christopher B. Sturdyen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen
dc.rights© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017en
dc.subjectAcoustic discrimination; bioacoustic analysis; black-capped chickadee; categorization; operant conditioning; songbirden
dc.titleDiscrimination of acoustically similar conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus)en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030117988en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10071-017-1087-5en
dc.identifier.pubid476348-
pubs.library.collectionPsychology publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS14en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidMcMillan, N. [0000-0003-0027-3095]en
Appears in Collections:Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.