Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Getting it Right: validating a culturally specific screening tool for depression (aPHQ-9) in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians
Author: Hackett, M.L.
Teixeira-Pinto, A.
Farnbach, S.
Glozier, N.
Skinner, T.
Askew, D.A.
Gee, G.
Cass, A.
Brown, A.
Citation: Medical Journal of Australia, 2019; 211(1):24-30
Publisher: Australasian Medical Publishing Company
Issue Date: 2019
ISSN: 0025-729X
Statement of
Maree L Hackett, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Sara Farnbach, Nicholas Glozier, Timothy Skinner, Deborah A Askew, Graham Gee, Alan Cass, Alex Brown
Abstract: Objectives: To determine the validity, sensitivity, specificity and acceptability of the culturally adapted nine‐item Patient Health Questionnaire (aPHQ‐9) as a screening tool for depression in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Design: Prospective observational validation study, 25 March 2015 – 2 November 2016. Setting, participants: 500 adults (18 years or older) who identified as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander people and attended one of ten primary health care services or service events in urban, rural and remote Australia that predominantly serve Indigenous Australians, and were able to communicate sufficiently to respond to questionnaire and interview questions. Main outcome measures: Criterion validity of the aPHQ‐9, with the depression module of the Mini‐International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) 6.0.0 as the criterion standard. Results: 108 of 500 participants (22%; 95% CI, 18–25%) had a current episode of major depression according to the MINI criterion. The sensitivity of the aPHQ‐9 algorithm for diagnosing a current major depressive episode was 54% (95% CI, 40–68%), its specificity was 91% (95% CI, 88–94%), with a positive predictive value of 64%. For screening for a current major depressive episode, the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85–0.92); with a cut‐point of 10 points its sensitivity was 84% (95% CI, 74–91%) and its specificity 77% (95% CI, 71–83%). The aPHQ‐9 was deemed acceptable by more than 80% of participants. Conclusions: Indigenous Australians found the aPHQ‐9 acceptable as a screening tool for depression. Applying a cut‐point of 10 points, the performance characteristics of the aPHQ were good.
Keywords: Getting it Right Collaborative Group; Humans; Mass Screening; Logistic Models; Sensitivity and Specificity; Prospective Studies; Depressive Disorder, Major; Adult; Middle Aged; Oceanic Ancestry Group; Health Services, Indigenous; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Australia; Female; Male; Cultural Competency; Surveys and Questionnaires
Rights: © 2019 AMPCo Pty Ltd.
RMID: 0030121079
DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50212
Grant ID:
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.