Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/120996
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Quantifying phytogeographical regions of Australia using geospatial turnover in species composition
Author: González-Orozco, C.
Ebach, M.
Laffan, S.
Thornhill, A.
Knerr, N.
Schmidt-Lebuhn, A.
Cargill, C.
Clements, M.
Nagalingum, N.
Mishler, B.
Miller, J.
Citation: PLoS ONE, 2014; 9(3):e92558-1-e92558-10
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Issue Date: 2014
ISSN: 1932-6203
1932-6203
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Carlos E. González-Orozco, Malte C. Ebach, Shawn Laffan, Andrew H. Thornhill, Nunzio J. Knerr, Alexander N. Schmidt-Lebuhn, Christine C. Cargill, Mark Clements, Nathalie S. Nagalingum, Brent D. Mishler, Joseph T. Miller
Abstract: The largest digitized dataset of land plant distributions in Australia assembled to date (750,741 georeferenced herbarium records; 6,043 species) was used to partition the Australian continent into phytogeographical regions. We used a set of six widely distributed vascular plant groups and three non-vascular plant groups which together occur in a variety of landscapes/habitats across Australia. Phytogeographical regions were identified using quantitative analyses of species turnover, the rate of change in species composition between sites, calculated as Simpson's beta. We propose six major phytogeographical regions for Australia: Northern, Northern Desert, Eremaean, Eastern Queensland, Euronotian and South-Western. Our new phytogeographical regions show a spatial agreement of 65% with respect to previously defined phytogeographical regions of Australia. We also confirm that these new regions are in general agreement with the biomes of Australia and other contemporary biogeographical classifications. To assess the meaningfulness of the proposed phytogeographical regions, we evaluated how they relate to broad scale environmental gradients. Physiographic factors such as geology do not have a strong correspondence with our proposed regions. Instead, we identified climate as the main environmental driver. The use of an unprecedentedly large dataset of multiple plant groups, coupled with an explicit quantitative analysis, makes this study novel and allows an improved historical bioregionalization scheme for Australian plants. Our analyses show that: (1) there is considerable overlap between our results and older biogeographic classifications; (2) phytogeographical regions based on species turnover can be a powerful tool to further partition the landscape into meaningful units; (3) further studies using phylogenetic turnover metrics are needed to test the taxonomic areas.
Keywords: Phylogeny
Rights: © 2014 Gonzalez-Orozco et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
RMID: 0030132917
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092558
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FT0992002
Appears in Collections:Ecology, Evolution and Landscape Science publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_120996.pdfPublished Version626.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.