Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEdney, L.-
dc.contributor.authorHaji Ali Afzali, H.-
dc.contributor.authorKarnon, J.-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Health Review, 2019; 43(5):508-510-
dc.description.abstractThe Australian health system performs well compared with other developed countries, but there is potential for improved health outcomes through the consideration of the opportunity costs of funding new health services. The opportunity costs of funding a new health service are the benefits forgone from the activities that would be funded if the new health service was not funded. When the forgone activity cannot be observed directly, the expected opportunity costs have been estimated as the expected gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with marginal increases in government expenditure on health. We have previously estimated that a gain of 1 QALY is expected for every additional A$28 033 of government expenditure on health. This paper discusses the relevance and proposed use of this estimate of opportunity costs to inform decisions around the public funding of new health services in Australia.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLaura Edney, Hossein Haji Ali Afzali, Jonathan Karnon-
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishing-
dc.rightsJournal compilation © AHHA 2019-
dc.subjectHealth policy; health services research; health systems; population health-
dc.titleAre the benefits of new health services greater than their opportunity costs?-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.orcidEdney, L. [0000-0002-2447-4118]-
dc.identifier.orcidKarnon, J. [0000-0003-3220-2099]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.