Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Hannah Arendt and Edward Said: Exile and Binationalism|
|Citation:||Philosophy Today, 2018; 62(2):377-395|
|Publisher:||Philosophy Documentation Center|
|Abstract:||In this essay, I focus on the extent to which the condition of exile influenced the way Hannah Arendt and Edward Said engaged with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and concepts of Binationalism. Part one is largely biographical and narrates the conditions under which both parties went into exile and the ways exile influenced their intellectual development and identity. Part two analyses Arendt’s early Jewish writings and the ways she sought to affirm notions of equality and Binationalism as a method for protecting stateless refugees. Following this, I consider Said’s concern for the memory and experience of victims and his argument that the shared histories of dispossession endured by Jews and Palestinians might form the basis for an alliance. While Binationalism has largely been erased from political discourse today, I conclude by suggesting that Said’s intervention offers useful tools through which Arendt’s proposals might be rethought or reimagined today.|
|Keywords:||Binationalism; Israel; Palestine; exile; cohabitation|
|Rights:||© 2018 DePaul University.|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest 3|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.