Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/124987
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Perry, C. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Scientific Studies of Reading, 2018; 22(3):264-272 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1088-8438 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1532-799X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/124987 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The latest version of the connectionist dual process model of reading (CDP++.parser) was tested on a set of nonwords, many of which were orthographically strange (e.g., PSIZ). A grapheme-by-grapheme read-out strategy was used because the normal strategy produced many poor responses. The new strategy allowed the model to produce results similar to individual participants. Given that the strategy uses only simple information acquired in the normal course of learning, it shows that it is a plausible method for reading when the normal method fails and offers insight into how groups with low orthographic exposure might read. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Conrad Perry | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis | - |
dc.rights | © 2018 Society for the Scientific Study of Reading | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1433673 | - |
dc.title | Reading orthographically strange nonwords: modelling backup strategies in reading | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/10888438.2018.1433673 | - |
dc.relation.grant | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP170101857 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Perry, C. [0000-0002-3429-0240] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 8 Psychology publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.