Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/126673
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHumphries, E.L.-
dc.contributor.authorKroon, H.M.-
dc.contributor.authorDudi Venkata, N.-
dc.contributor.authorThomas, M.L.-
dc.contributor.authorMoore, J.W.-
dc.contributor.authorSammour, T.-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationANZ Journal of Surgery, 2019; 89(6):E226-E230-
dc.identifier.issn1445-2197-
dc.identifier.issn1445-2197-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/126673-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Most published data on pelvic exenteration comes from high-volume quaternary units, with limited data available from outside of this setting. This study reports outcomes of selective pelvic exenteration performed in a low-volume tertiary unit with multidisciplinary support. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent pelvic exenteration surgery for rectal/anal carcinoma, or gynaecological malignancy at Royal Adelaide Hospital between June 2008 and September 2018. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier analysis of 5-year disease-free and overall survival for patients treated with curative intent were performed. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients who underwent pelvic exenteration were included. Most patients presented with primary rectal adenocarcinoma, and posterior and total pelvic exenterations were the most common operations performed (>90%). Median total operating time was 323 min, median hospital stay was 15 days, and the readmission rate was 14.8%. The overall complication rate (per patient) was 70.4%, and the re-intervention rate was 20.4%. Thirteen percent of patients required intensive care unit-admission, and there was one postoperative death (1.9%). R0 resection margins were achieved in 81.5% of patients, with R1 and R2 margins in 13.0 and 5.6% of patients, respectively. Estimated 5-year disease-free survival was 38.8%, and 5-year overall survival was 65.7%. CONCLUSION: Short- and long-term outcomes of selective pelvic exenteration surgery are acceptable in a low-volume specialized tertiary setting with suitable multidisciplinary expertise. If the required expertise is not readily available, then outside referral is recommended.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityEmily L. Humphries, Hidde M. Kroon, Nagendra N. Dudi-Venkata, Michelle L. Thomas, James W. Moore and Tarik Sammour-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWILEY-
dc.rights© 2019 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons-
dc.subjectcolorectal pelvic exenteration-
dc.titleShort- and long-term outcomes of selective pelvic exenteration surgery in a low-volume specialized tertiary setting-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ans.15212-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidKroon, H.M. [0000-0002-8923-7527]-
dc.identifier.orcidDudi Venkata, N. [0000-0002-9775-3599]-
dc.identifier.orcidSammour, T. [0000-0002-4918-8871]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.