Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/127100
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: The rebound effect on water extraction from subsidising irrigation infrastructure in Australia
Author: Wheeler, S.
Carmody, E.
Grafton, R.
Kingsford, R.
Zuo, A.
Citation: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020; 159:104755-1-104755-17
Publisher: Elsevier
Issue Date: 2020
ISSN: 0921-3449
1879-0658
Statement of
Responsibility: 
S.A. Wheeler, E. Carmody, R.Q. Grafton, R.T. Kingsford, A. Zuo
Abstract: Over the past decade, Australia has been buying water entitlements and subsidising irrigation infrastructure to reallocate water from consumptive to environmental purposes in the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB). There is considerable evidence that irrigation infrastructure subsidies are not cost-effective, as well as questions as to whether water extractions are increasing (rebounding) as a result. We used 2481 on-farm MDB irrigation surveys and identified a ‘rebound effect’ on water extractions, with irrigators who received an irrigation infrastructure subsidy significantly increasing (21-28%) their water extraction, relative to those who did not receive any grants. Although the precise hydrological impact of this rebound effect on catchment and Basin-wide extractions remains unknown, publicly available water data suggest that reductions in extractions from the MDB – supposedly commensurate with increases in environmental flows – may have been overestimated, particularly in the Northern MDB. This overestimation may in turn be linked to issues with water measurement and extractions at the catchment and Basin-scale, which occur due to: (1) water theft and poor enforcement; (2) inaccurate or absent water metering; (3) growth in unlicensed surface and groundwater extractions and on-farm storage capacity; (4) legal and practical uncertainties in compliance tools, processes and water accounting; and (5) complexity of floodplain, evaporation and groundwater interactions. To respond to these water governance challenges, MDB water and rural policy actions must: (1) improve measurement of diversions and develop transparent and robust water accounting, independently audited and accounting for uncertainty; (2) improve compliance, fines and regulation; (3) use multiple lines of evidence for water accounting and compliance; and (4) prioritise the cost and environmental effectiveness of water recovery.
Keywords: Murray-Darling Basin plan; irrigation infrastructure subsidies; rebound effect; water markets; water governance
Rights: © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).
RMID: 1000019756
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104755
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FT140100773
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP180100159
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FL190100164
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP200101191
Appears in Collections:Global Food Studies publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_127100.pdfPublished Version1.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.