Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/127100
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, S.en
dc.contributor.authorCarmody, E.en
dc.contributor.authorGrafton, R.en
dc.contributor.authorKingsford, R.en
dc.contributor.authorZuo, A.en
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.citationResources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020; 159:104755-1-104755-17en
dc.identifier.issn0921-3449en
dc.identifier.issn1879-0658en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/127100-
dc.description.abstractOver the past decade, Australia has been buying water entitlements and subsidising irrigation infrastructure to reallocate water from consumptive to environmental purposes in the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB). There is considerable evidence that irrigation infrastructure subsidies are not cost-effective, as well as questions as to whether water extractions are increasing (rebounding) as a result. We used 2481 on-farm MDB irrigation surveys and identified a ‘rebound effect’ on water extractions, with irrigators who received an irrigation infrastructure subsidy significantly increasing (21-28%) their water extraction, relative to those who did not receive any grants. Although the precise hydrological impact of this rebound effect on catchment and Basin-wide extractions remains unknown, publicly available water data suggest that reductions in extractions from the MDB – supposedly commensurate with increases in environmental flows – may have been overestimated, particularly in the Northern MDB. This overestimation may in turn be linked to issues with water measurement and extractions at the catchment and Basin-scale, which occur due to: (1) water theft and poor enforcement; (2) inaccurate or absent water metering; (3) growth in unlicensed surface and groundwater extractions and on-farm storage capacity; (4) legal and practical uncertainties in compliance tools, processes and water accounting; and (5) complexity of floodplain, evaporation and groundwater interactions. To respond to these water governance challenges, MDB water and rural policy actions must: (1) improve measurement of diversions and develop transparent and robust water accounting, independently audited and accounting for uncertainty; (2) improve compliance, fines and regulation; (3) use multiple lines of evidence for water accounting and compliance; and (4) prioritise the cost and environmental effectiveness of water recovery.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityS.A. Wheeler, E. Carmody, R.Q. Grafton, R.T. Kingsford, A. Zuoen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rights© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).en
dc.subjectMurray-Darling Basin plan; irrigation infrastructure subsidies; rebound effect; water markets; water governanceen
dc.titleThe rebound effect on water extraction from subsidising irrigation infrastructure in Australiaen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid1000019756en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104755en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FT140100773en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP180100159en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FL190100164en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP200101191en
dc.identifier.pubid530659-
pubs.library.collectionGlobal Food Studies publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS14en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidWheeler, S. [0000-0002-6073-3172]en
dc.identifier.orcidZuo, A. [0000-0003-0425-4633]en
Appears in Collections:Global Food Studies publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_127100.pdfPublished Version1.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.