Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDonald, M.en
dc.contributor.authorLe Mire, S.en
dc.identifier.citationUniversity of New South Wales law journal, 2019; 42(1):300-334en
dc.description.abstractThis article reports on a series of interviews with superannuation fund directors that examine how director independence is framed, viewed and operationalised in the superannuation context. The interviews highlight the interaction between structural independence rules and other familiar governance issues, such as remuneration, nomination and board tenure arrangements. The role and potential for independence to address conflicts of interest, skills and diversity issues is also discussed. The paper concludes that independence reforms such as those envisaged in recent government proposals have the potential to deal with some of the governance shortfalls present in the various sectors of the superannuation system, but only if carefully drafted and appropriately buttressed with ancillary regulation.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityM Scott Donald and Suzanne Le Mireen
dc.publisherLaw School, University of New South Walesen
dc.rights© University of New South Wales Law Journalen
dc.subjectsuperannuation; fund directorsen
dc.titleIndependence in practice: Superannuation fund governance through the eyes of fund directorsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
pubs.library.collectionLaw publicationsen
dc.identifier.orcidLe Mire, S. [0000-0003-4069-5348]en
Appears in Collections:Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.