Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurgan, Barry Johnen
dc.contributor.authorMules, T.en
dc.identifier.citationTourism Economics : The Business and Finance of Tourism and Recreation, 2001; 7 (4):321-330en
dc.description.abstractGovernments frequently justify their expenditure on underwriting the commercial viability of tourism events in terms of the economic impacts that the events bring to their host region. However, the justification for public expenditure in general is more usually based upon cost-benefit analysis, founded on the principles of welfare economics. It concentrates on consumer and producer surplus measures, with a particular emphasis on consumer surplus. In many cases the focus of special events is not on local consumers, but on attracting consumers from outside the region. In this case, producer surplus is the more appropriate focus. It generally assumes that resources are used at their opportunity cost. In contrast, economic impact analysis involves estimating the full value associated with the use of either labour or capital. This paper demonstrates that there is a potential correspondence between the welfare economics paradigm of cost-benefit analysis and the growth-based paradigm of economic impact. That link is based on an underlying presumption that resources are unused or underused, and therefore income generation is a real benefit.en
dc.publisherI P Publishing Ltd.en
dc.titleReconciling cost-benefit and economic impact assessment for event tourismen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.schoolBusiness Schoolen
Appears in Collections:Business School publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.