Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The relationship between paranormal belief and psychopathology with special focus on magical ideation, psychosis, and schizotypy|
|Citation:||Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 2019; 19(2):181-211|
|Publisher:||Australian Institute of Parapsychological Research|
|Michael A. Thalbourne and Lance Storm|
|Abstract:||We sought an answer to the question, Are paranormal claimants more likely or less likely to manifest psychopathology than those who make no such claims? Reviews of previous research, and a re-analysis of old data, indicate there is no burgeoning need to pathologize paranormal believers, even if measures suggest a tendency for characteristic symptoms. While psychopathology (probably prodromal) may still be suggested under specific circumstances, the blunt term ‘psychosis’ may be misapplied in cases where a non-clinical condition known as ‘spiritual emergency’ is evident. Likewise, schizotypy in some paranormal believers may be a condition needing attention, but the so-called ‘happy schizotype’ seems somewhat of an exception. Study designs are proposed that might help better understand the happy schizotype and spiritual emergency.|
|Keywords:||basic limiting principles; paranormal belief; psychosis; schizotypy; sheep-goat effect; spiritual emergency|
|Rights:||© 2019 AIPR, Inc.|
|Appears in Collections:||Psychology publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.