Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/130277
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBonsu, D.O.M.-
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, D.-
dc.contributor.authorHenry, J.-
dc.contributor.authorAustin, J.J.-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationForensic Science Medicine and Pathology, 2021; 17(2):199-207-
dc.identifier.issn1547-769X-
dc.identifier.issn1556-2891-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/130277-
dc.descriptionPublished online: 12 November 2020-
dc.description.abstractPurpose We investigated the recovery and extraction efficiency of DNA from three metal surfaces (brass, copper, steel) relevant to forensic casework, and plastic (control) using two different swabbing systems; Rayon and Isohelix™ swabs, with sterile water and isopropyl alcohol respectively, as the wetting solutions. Methods Twenty nanograms of human genomic DNA were applied directly to Isohelix™ and Rayon swabs; and to the metal and plastic substrates. All substrates were left to dry for 24 h, followed by single wet swabbing and extraction with the DNA IQ™ System. DNA extracts were quantified using real time quantitative PCR assays with SYBR green chemistry. Results DNA was extracted from directly seeded Isohelix™ swabs with a high efficiency of 98%, indicating effective DNArelease from the swab into the extraction buffer. In contrast, only 58% of input DNA was recovered from seeded Rayon swabs, indicating higher DNA retention by these swabs. Isohelix™ swabs recovered 32 – 53% of DNA from metal surfaces, whilst the Rayon swabs recovered 11—29%. DNA recovery was lowest from copper and highest from brass. Interestingly, Rayon swabs appeared to collect more DNA from the plastic surface than Isohelix™ swabs, however, due to the lower release of DNA from Rayon swabs they returned less DNA overall following extraction than Isohelix™ swabs. Conclusion These results demonstrate that DNA samples deposited on metal surfaces can be more efficiently recovered using Isohelix™ swabs wetted with isopropyl alcohol than Rayon swabs wetted with sterile water, although recovery is affected by the substrate type.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDan O. M. Bonsu, Denice Higgins, Julianne Henry, Jeremy J. Austin-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer (part of Springer Nature)-
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12024-020-00329-x-
dc.subjectMetal surfaces; Isohelix™ swab; Rayon swab; Collection efficiency; Release efficiency; Extraction efficiency-
dc.titleEvaluation of the efficiency of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabs for recovery of DNA from metal surfaces-
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation of the efficiency of Isohelix TM and Rayon swabs for recovery of DNA from metal surfaces-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12024-020-00329-x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBonsu, D.O.M. [0000-0002-4671-0521]-
dc.identifier.orcidHiggins, D. [0000-0001-7780-243X]-
dc.identifier.orcidAustin, J.J. [0000-0003-4244-2942]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Australian Centre for Ancient DNA publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_130277.pdfAccepted version1.4 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.