Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/130519
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Extreme heat and occupational injuries in different climate zones: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence
Author: Fatima, S.H.
Rothmore, P.
Giles, L.C.
Varghese, B.M.
Bi, P.
Citation: Environment International, 2021; 148:106384-1-106384-22
Publisher: Elsevier
Issue Date: 2021
ISSN: 0160-4120
1873-6750
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Syeda Hira Fatima, Paul Rothmore, Lynne C. Giles, Blesson M. Varghese, Peng Bi
Abstract: Background: The link between heat exposure and adverse health outcomes in workers is well documented and a growing body of epidemiological evidence from various countries suggests that extreme heat may also contribute to increased risk of occupational injuries (OI). Previously, there have been no comparative reviews assessing the risk of OI due to extreme heat within a wide range of global climate zones. The present review therefore aims to summarise the existing epidemiological evidence on the impact of extreme heat (hot temperatures and heatwaves (HW)) on OI in different climate zones and to assess the individual risk factors associated with workers and workplace that contribute to heat-associated OI risks. Methods: A systematic review of published peer-reviewed articles that assessed the effects of extreme heat on OI among non-military workers was undertaken using three databases (PubMed, Embase and Scopus) without temporal or geographical limits from database inception until July 2020. Extreme heat exposure was assessed in terms of hot temperatures and HW periods. For hot temperatures, the effect estimates were converted to relative risks (RR) associated with 1 ◦C increase in temperature above reference values, while for HW, effect estimates were RR comparing heatwave with non-heatwave periods. The patterns of heat associated OI risk were investigated in different climate zones (according to K¨oppen Geiger classification) based on the study locations and were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis models. Subgroup analyses according to workers’ characteristics (e.g. gender, age group, experience), nature of work (e. g. physical demands, location of work i.e. indoor/outdoor) and workplace characteristics (e.g. industries, business size) were also conducted. Results: A total of 24 studies published between 2005 and 2020 were included in the review. Among these, 22 studies met the eligibility criteria, representing almost 22 million OI across six countries (Australia, Canada, China, Italy, Spain, and USA) and were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results suggested that the overall risk of OI increased by 1% (RR 1.010, 95% CI: 1.009–1.011) for 1 ◦C increase in temperature above reference values and 17.4% (RR 1.174, 95% CI: 1.057–1.291) during HW. Among different climate zones, the highest risk of OI during hot temperatures was identified in Humid Subtropical Climates (RR 1.017, 95% CI: 1.014–1.020) followed by Oceanic (RR 1.010, 95% CI: 1.008–1.012) and Hot Mediterranean Climates (RR 1.009, 95% CI: 1.008–1.011). Similarly, Oceanic (RR 1.218, 95% CI: 1.093–1.343) and Humid Subtropical Climates (RR 1.213, 95% CI: 0.995–1.431) had the highest risk of OI during HW periods. No studies assessing the risk of OI in Tropical regions were found. The effects of hot temperatures on the risk of OI were acute with a lag effect of 1–2 days in all climate zones. Young workers (age < 35 years), male workers and workers in agriculture, forestry or fishing, construction and manufacturing industries were at high risk of OI during hot temperatures. Further young workers (age < 35 years), male workers and those working in electricity, gas and water and manufacturing industries were found to be at high risk of OI during HW. Conclusions: This review strengthens the evidence on the risk of heat-associated OI in different climate zones. The risk of OI associated with extreme heat is not evenly distributed and is dependent on underlying climatic conditions, workers’ attributes, the nature of work and workplace characteristics. The differences in the risk of OI across different climate zones and worker subgroups warrant further investigation along with the development of climate and work-specific intervention strategies.
Keywords: Occupation injuries; Hot temperatures; Heatwaves; Climate zones
Description: Available online 17 January 2021
Rights: © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106384
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP200102571
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_130519.pdfPublished version3.71 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.