Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/131868
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia |
Author: | Duncanson, E. Bennett, P.N. Viecelli, A. Dansie, K. Handke, W. Tong, A. Palmer, S. Jesudason, S. McDonald, S.P. Morton, R.L. |
Citation: | BMJ Open, 2020; 10(11):e039014-1-e039014-7 |
Publisher: | BMJ Journals |
Issue Date: | 2020 |
ISSN: | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Emily Duncanson, Paul N Bennett, Andrea Viecelli, Kathryn Dansie, William Handke, Allison Tong |
Abstract: | INTRODUCTION: People receiving haemodialysis experience a high symptom burden and impaired quality of life. The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is increasing in nephrology care, however their acceptability, utility and impacts are not well understood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We describe a protocol for a qualitative study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of electronic-PROMs (e-PROMs) data capture and feedback in haemodialysis following the pilot Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT). SWIFT involves linkage of e-PROMs data, including symptoms and health-related quality of life, to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry with feedback to patients' treating nephrologists and nurse unit managers. Focus groups and semistructured interviews will be conducted with nephrologists (n=15), dialysis nurses (n=24) and patients receiving haemodialysis (n=24) from six dialysis units in Australia. Question topics will include the technical and clinical feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs reporting and feedback (including the barriers and enablers to uptake) and perceived impact on patient care and outcomes. Transcripts will be analysed thematically and guided by Normalisation Process Theory. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the relevant hospital Human Research Ethics Committees (HREC/18/CALHN/481; HREC/MML/54599). The findings from the SWIFT pilot and qualitative evaluation will inform the implementation of the SWIFT main trial, and more broadly, the use of e-PROMs in clinical settings and registries. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTRN12618001976279. |
Keywords: | adult nephrology chronic renal failure dialysis nephrology qualitative research |
Rights: | © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039014 |
Grant ID: | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1159051 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1092957 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 8 Medicine publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hdl_131868.pdf | 301.55 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.