Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/132914
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Modelling the validity of periodontal disease screening questions in a nondental clinical setting
Author: Kapellas, K.
Ali, A.
Jamieson, L.M.
Citation: International Dental Journal, 2021; 71(5):407-413
Publisher: Elsevier
Issue Date: 2021
ISSN: 0020-6539
1875-595X
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Kostas Kapellas, Anna Ali, Lisa M. Jamieson
Abstract: Objective: Periodontal examinations are time-consuming and potentially uncomfortable for recipients. We modelled if self-reported questions alone, or combined with objective evidence of periodontal bone loss observable from radiographs, are accurate predictors of periodontitis. Methods: Self-reported data from the Australian National Survey of Adult Oral Heath 2004-06 were compared with clinical periodontal examinations to assess the validity of 8 periodontitis screening questions in predicting moderate/severe periodontitis. To model alveolar bone loss, a proxy variable simulating radiographic clinical attachment level (rCAL) was created. Three multivariable binary logistic regression models were constructed: responses to 8 screening questions alone (Model 1), screening questions combined with 5 classic periodontitis risk indicators (age, sex, smoking status, country of birth, and diabetes status) (Model 2), and the addition of rCAL (Model 3). Predictive validity was determined via sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) scores and graphically represented using area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUROC). Results: Data from 3630 participants periodontally examined determined that 32.4% exhibited periodontitis. Periodontitis risk indicators were all significantly associated with periodontitis case status. Six of 8 screening questions (Model 1) were weak periodontitis predictors (Se = 0.28; Sp = 0.89; AUROC = 0.61). Combining 13 variables for (Model 2) improved prediction (Se = 0.55; Sp = 0.81; AUROC = 0.77). The addition of rCAL (Model 3) improved diagnostic capacity considerably (AUROC = 0.86). Conclusions: Self-reported questions combined with classic risk indicators are “useful” for periodontitis screening. Addition of radiographs markedly improved diagnostic validity. Based on modelling, nondental health care professionals may provisionally screen for periodontitis with minimal training.
Keywords: Validation; periodontal disease; self-assessment; screening
Rights: © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of FDI World Dental Federation. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2020.12.013
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/299060
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/349514
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/349537
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1113098
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2020.12.013
Appears in Collections:Dentistry publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_132914.pdfPublished Version239.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.