Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Liberal Naturalism, Aesthetic Reflection, and the Sublime|
|Citation:||The Routledge Handbook of Liberal Naturalism, 2022 / De Caro, M., Macarthur, D. (ed./s), Ch.24, pp.281-298|
|Publisher Place:||New York and London|
|Series/Report no.:||Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy|
|Editor:||De Caro, M.|
|Abstract:||According to the scientific image, aesthetic experience is constituted by private reverie or mindless gratification of some kind. This image fails to fully acknowledge the theoretical and hence cultural aspect of perception, which includes aesthetic experience. This chapter reframes aesthetic reflective judgment in terms of perceptual processes (section 2); intentional pleasure (section 3); non-perceptually represented perceptual properties (section 4); and intersubjectivity (section 5). By clarifying the relevant terms, the liberal naturalist account of the sublime provides the link between the sublime and moral motivation (section 6).|
|Keywords:||Knowledge, Theory of|
|Rights:||© 2022 selection and editorial matter Mario De Caro and David Macarthur; individual chapters, the contributors. The right of Mario De Caro and David Macarthur to be identified as the authors of the editorial material, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved.|
|Appears in Collections:||Philosophy publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.