Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/15664
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChurches, Christine Maien
dc.date.issued2000en
dc.identifier.citationHistorical Journal, 2000; 43(4):937-954en
dc.identifier.issn0018-246Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/15664-
dc.description.abstractRecent work on the records of civil litigation in the central courts of Westminster has refined and extended our knowledge of levels of litigation and the types of dispute pursued at law in early modern England. This article discusses two interrelated business disputes at the port of Whitehaven in the first half of the eighteenth century pursued by two of its prominent merchants, both frequent litigants in a period when litigation overall was declining, and suggests some reasons for that decline. It matches the formal court records of King's Bench, Common Pleas, and Chancery with some illuminating, often acerbic, private correspondence, thereby exploring the process and background of litigation, and demonstrating how a third party could influence the conduct and direction of the disputes, while himself remaining almost invisible in the formal legal record.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityChristine Churchesen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2000 Cambridge University Pressen
dc.titleBusiness at law: retrieving commercial disputes from eighteenth-century Chanceryen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of History and Politics : Historyen
dc.provenancePublished online by Cambridge University Press 01 Mar 2001en
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0018246X00001436en
Appears in Collections:History publications

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Churches_15664.pdf152.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.