Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||What's really doing the work here? Knowledge representation or the Higher-Order Thought theory of Consciousness?|
|Citation:||Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1999; 22(5):778-779|
|Publisher:||CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS|
|Abstract:||<jats:p>Dienes & Perner offer us a theory of explicit and implicit knowledge that promises to systematise a large and diverse body of research in cognitive psychology. Their advertised strategy is to unpack this distinction in terms of explicit and implicit <jats:italic>representation.</jats:italic> But when one digs deeper one finds the “Higher-Order Thought” theory of consciousness doing much of the work. This reduces both the plausibility and usefulness of their account. We think their strategy is broadly correct, but that consensus on the explicit/implicit knowledge distinction is still a fair way off.</jats:p>|
|Appears in Collections:||Philosophy publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.