Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/16127
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOpie, J.-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.citationPsycoloquy, 1999; 10(21):Article 6--
dc.identifier.issn1055-0143-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/16127-
dc.description.abstractLatimer & Stevens (1997) develop a useful framework for discussing issues surrounding the definition and explanation of perceptual Gestalts. They use this framework to raise some doubts about the possibility of "holistic" perceptual processing. However, I suspect that these doubts ultimately stem from assumptions about the nature of representation and processing in the brain, rather than from an analysis of part/whole concepts. I attempt to spell out these assumptions, and sketch an alternative perspective deriving from Gestalt theory) that has the potential to make sense of holism in perception.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association-
dc.titleGestalt theories of cognitive representation and processing-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidOpie, J. [0000-0001-6593-4750]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Philosophy publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.