Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/16127
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Opie, J. | - |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Psycoloquy, 1999; 10(21):Article 6- | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1055-0143 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/16127 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Latimer & Stevens (1997) develop a useful framework for discussing issues surrounding the definition and explanation of perceptual Gestalts. They use this framework to raise some doubts about the possibility of "holistic" perceptual processing. However, I suspect that these doubts ultimately stem from assumptions about the nature of representation and processing in the brain, rather than from an analysis of part/whole concepts. I attempt to spell out these assumptions, and sketch an alternative perspective deriving from Gestalt theory) that has the potential to make sense of holism in perception. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | American Psychological Association | - |
dc.title | Gestalt theories of cognitive representation and processing | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Opie, J. [0000-0001-6593-4750] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 2 Philosophy publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.