Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/16998
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVales, M.en
dc.contributor.authorSchon, C.en
dc.contributor.authorCapettini, F.en
dc.contributor.authorChen, X.en
dc.contributor.authorCorey, A.en
dc.contributor.authorMather, D.en
dc.contributor.authorMundt, C.en
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, K.en
dc.contributor.authorSandoval-Islas, J.en
dc.contributor.authorUtz, H.en
dc.contributor.authorHayes, P.en
dc.date.issued2005en
dc.identifier.citationTheoretical and Applied Genetics, 2005; 111(7):1260-1270en
dc.identifier.issn0040-5752en
dc.identifier.issn1432-2242en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/16998-
dc.descriptionThe original publication can be found at www.springerlink.comen
dc.description.abstractThe limited population sizes used in many quantitative trait locus (QTL) detection experiments can lead to underestimation of QTL number, overestimation of QTL effects, and failure to quantify QTL interactions. We used the barley/barley stripe rust pathosystem to evaluate the effect of population size on the estimation of QTL parameters. We generated a large (n=409) population of doubled haploid lines derived from the cross of two inbred lines, BCD47 and Baronesse. This population was evaluated for barley stripe rust severity in the Toluca Valley, Mexico, and in Washington State, USA, under field conditions. BCD47 was the principal donor of resistance QTL alleles, but the susceptible parent also contributed some resistance alleles. The major QTL, located on the long arm of chromosome 4H, close to the Mlo gene, accounted for up to 34% of the phenotypic variance. Subpopulations of different sizes were generated using three methods—resampling, selective genotyping, and selective phenotyping—to evaluate the effect of population size on the estimation of QTL parameters. In all cases, the number of QTL detected increased with population size. QTL with large effects were detected even in small populations, but QTL with small effects were detected only by increasing population size. Selective genotyping and/or selective phenotyping approaches could be effective strategies for reducing the costs associated with conducting QTL analysis in large populations. The method of choice will depend on the relative costs of genotyping versus phenotyping.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.source.urihttp://www.springerlink.com/content/v5237v6587137025/?p=86741d26197f45bfb172d1604ad84898&pi=3en
dc.subjectHordeum vulgare; Puccinia striiformis f. sp. Hordei; Quantitative trait loci; Selective genotyping; Selective phenotyping; Random samplingen
dc.titleEffect of population size on the estimation of QTL: a test using resistance to barley stripe rusten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020051774en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00122-005-0043-yen
dc.identifier.pubid54100-
pubs.library.collectionAgriculture, Food and Wine publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidMather, D. [0000-0001-7506-2589]en
Appears in Collections:Agriculture, Food and Wine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.