Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/17280
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Spirometric criteria for asthma: adding further evidence to the debate
Author: Appleton, S.
Adams, R.
Wilson, D.
Taylor, A.
Ruffin, R.
Citation: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2005; 116(5):976-982
Publisher: Mosby Inc
Issue Date: 2005
ISSN: 0091-6749
1097-6825
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Sarah L. Appleton, Robert J. Adams, David H. Wilson, Anne W. Taylor and Richard E. Ruffin
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Objective assessments of pulmonary function are considered essential for the diagnosis of asthma. The degree of reversibility of FEV1 considered supportive of asthma varies between international asthma guidelines. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the relative performance of international guideline reversibility criteria for identifying impairment in persons with a significant bronchodilator response (SBR) without an asthma diagnosis. METHODS: The North West Adelaide Health (Cohort) Study, a population biomedical study of 4060 subjects, conducted spirometry according to American Thoracic Society criteria. SBR was defined as postbronchodilator FEV1 responses of at least 12% or 15% of baseline values, 9% of predicted values, or 400 mL. A self-completed questionnaire assessed current asthma (CA), respiratory symptoms, and participant demographics. RESULTS: The prevalence of CA was 9.4% (n = 380), whereas 1.3% (≥400 mL) to 4.5% (≥9% of predicted value) of participants demonstrated an SBR in the absence of CA. With the exception of the 9% predicted criterion, prebronchodilator mean FEV1 (percent predicted) in those demonstrating an SBR but no CA was significantly worse than that in the CA group. Significantly more respiratory symptoms were experienced by the SBR groups than the group without asthma. Logistic regression analyses identified different characteristics of those classified by the following criteria: 12% and 15%, age of 40 years or greater and household income of less than $40,000; 9% predicted, household income of less than $40,000; 400 mL, male sex (odds ratio, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.1-9.3). CONCLUSIONS: Different criteria identify different persons, but SBR by any criteria was associated with significant respiratory impairment, some of which might be attributable to asthma. Postbronchodilator change as a percentage of predicted value was the least biased of the criteria.
Keywords: Asthma; spirometry; bronchodilator response; asthma epidemiology; asthma diagnosis
Description: © Mosby
RMID: 0020051302
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.08.034
Description (link): http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/623368/description#description
Appears in Collections:Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.