Phylogeny of Australasian venomous snakes (Colubroidea, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae) based on phenotypic and molecular evidence

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships among Hydrophiinae (Australasian and marine elapid snakes) are inferred using 87 characters from external, skeletal, hemipenial and internal anatomy, ecology, and chromosomes as well as available sequences of two mitochondrial genes (cytochrome b and 16S rRNA). Parsimony analysis of the combined data retrieves many widely accepted clades; while observed bootstrap or branch (Bremer) support for these is often weak, most have never been corroborated previously by a rigorous numerical analysis. Sea kraits (Laticauda) and Solomon Islands elapids are basal to the remaining hydrophiines (Australian terrestrial forms and hydrophiin sea snakes). The latter clade includes three main lineages: a large-bodied oviparous lineage, a small-bodied oviparous lineage, and a viviparous lineage (which also includes the hydrophiin sea snakes, strongly reaffirmed as monophyletic). While the Solomons retain a relictual fauna, New Guinea has less endemism and has been invaded multiple times by Australian lineages, so there is no clear ‘stepping stone’ pattern supporting a northern (Asian, rather than Gondwanan) biogeographical origin.