Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/22690
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, T.-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 2005; 25(3-4):365-399-
dc.identifier.issn0196-6324-
dc.identifier.issn2325-8454-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/22690-
dc.description© Oxford University Press-
dc.description.abstractSome dependent variables are not fully quantitative and cannot be exactly measured, yet the categories are not merely qualitatively different states: rather, observations are classified into ordered grades. Are the proportions of observations in the several grades related to one another in some systematic way, for example, do they arise from an underlying normal distribution? In some datasets, there are just three grades, and comparison is made of several different circumstances. An important question is whether the proportion in category 3 is positively correlated with the ratio fo the proportion sin categories 2 and 1. Statistical models are given which permit methods of linearizing this relationship to be suggested. The areas of application considered are as follows: injury severity in road accidents; “don’t know” responses in contingent valuation surveys; fracturing and shape of particles; taphonomy (i.e., the extent of deterioration of biological material over time); heart rate variability; pyrolysis (liquid may be intermediate between gas and solid); errors in neuropsychological tests (some may be less serious than others); errors in speechreading (one condition may be more difficult than another).-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityT. P. Hutchinson-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAmerican Sciences Press, Inc.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2005.10737656-
dc.subjectOrdinal categories-
dc.subjectlinearizing transformations-
dc.subjectP-P plots-
dc.subjectinjury severity-
dc.subjectparticle science-
dc.subjectcontingent valuation-
dc.subject“don’t know” responses-
dc.subjecttaphonomy-
dc.subjectheart rate variability-
dc.subjectpyrolysis-
dc.subjectcognitive neuropsychology-
dc.subjectspeechreading-
dc.titleOrdered categories: Graphs showing empirical relations between one proportion and another, and comparison with theories-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01966324.2005.10737656-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidHutchinson, T. [0000-0002-4429-0885]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Centre for Automotive Safety Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_22690.pdf2.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.