Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/22744
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | What are the public health effects of direct-to-consumer drug advertising? |
Author: | Almasi, E. Stafford, R. Kravitz, R. Mansfield, P. |
Citation: | PLoS Medicine, 2006; 3(3):284-288 |
Publisher: | Public Library of Science |
Issue Date: | 2006 |
ISSN: | 1549-1277 1549-1676 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Elizabeth A. Almasi, Randall S. Stafford, Richard L. Kravitz, Peter R. Mansfield |
Abstract: | Only two industrialized countries, the United States and New Zealand, allow direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription medicines, although New Zealand is planning a ban. The challenge for these governments is ensuring that DTCA is more beneficial than harmful. Proponents of DTCA argue that it helps to inform the public about available treatments and stimulates appropriate use of drugs for high-priority illnesses (such as statin use in people with ischemic heart disease). Critics argue that the information in the adverts is often biased and misleading, and that DTCA raises prescribing costs without net evidence of health benefits. |
Keywords: | Humans Patient Compliance Public Health Placebo Effect Advertising Drug Industry United States New Zealand Community Participation |
Rights: | Copyright: © 2006 Almasi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030145 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 6 General Practice publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hdl_22744.pdf | Published version | 160.16 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.