Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Type: Report
Title: Wormy logic: model organisms as case-based reasoning
Author: Ankeny, Rachel Allyson
Publisher: London School of Economics and Political Science
Issue Date: 2006
Series/Report no.: Working Papers on The Nature of Evidence: How Well Do ‘Facts’ Travel?; No. 07/06
School/Discipline: School of History and Politics : History
Abstract: In the past few decades, so-called model organisms have become a cornerstone of research in the biomedical sciences. For the scientists, the model organism is both a practice ground for developing laboratory techniques, and a source of insights into common or even universal biological mechanisms. This paper examines the conceptualization of model organisms as models, and presents a formal account of how they are used to generate knowledge through what can be viewed as a form of case-based reasoning. Case-based reasoning is an epistemic process that is far from straightforward and may seem to fail to allow us to obtain the usual results we expect in science. Meanwhile, a growing literature within the history and philosophy of science on modelling and representation creates a space within which close attention to the principles and practices associated with such models may prove fruitful. Following a brief historical account of the development and use of one model organism, the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans, this paper addresses questions about the methodologies underlying work on genetic sequencing and developmental processes in this organism. In particular, what types of reasoning ground the use of experimental organisms when they are being developed and used as model organisms, and how are these models refined over time?
Rights: © Rachel A. Ankeny
Published version:
Appears in Collections:History publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.