Adelaide Research & Scholarship
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/36445
| Citations | ||
| Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
|---|---|---|
|
?
|
?
|
|
| Type: | Journal article |
| Title: | The wrong responses to a very difficult item: A comparison of high-scoring and low-scoring examinees |
| Author: | Cairns, D. Chekaluk, E. Hutchinson, T. |
| Citation: | International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2002; 33(6):839-842 |
| Publisher: | Taylor & Francis Ltd. |
| Issue Date: | 2002 |
| ISSN: | 0020-739X 1464-5211 |
| Statement of Responsibility: | D. Cairns, E. Chekaluk and T. P. Hutchinson |
| Abstract: | Are some wrong alternatives disproportionately chosen by examinees of high ability (perhaps because they are less wrong than the other alternatives), and others disproportionately chosen by examinees of lower ability? Some evidence for this is given from the constructed-response context. |
| Keywords: | Mathematical ability mathematics study and teaching |
| Description: | © Taylor & Francis |
| DOI: | 10.1080/00207390210162494 |
| Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207390210162494 |
| Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Centre for Automotive Safety Research publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.