Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/36445
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCairns, D.-
dc.contributor.authorChekaluk, E.-
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, T.-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2002; 33(6):839-842-
dc.identifier.issn0020-739X-
dc.identifier.issn1464-5211-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/36445-
dc.description© Taylor & Francis-
dc.description.abstractAre some wrong alternatives disproportionately chosen by examinees of high ability (perhaps because they are less wrong than the other alternatives), and others disproportionately chosen by examinees of lower ability? Some evidence for this is given from the constructed-response context.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityD. Cairns, E. Chekaluk and T. P. Hutchinson-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltd.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207390210162494-
dc.subjectMathematical ability-
dc.subjectmathematics-
dc.subjectstudy and teaching-
dc.titleThe wrong responses to a very difficult item: A comparison of high-scoring and low-scoring examinees-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00207390210162494-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidHutchinson, T. [0000-0002-4429-0885]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Centre for Automotive Safety Research publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.