Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Sins of omission and commission
Author: O'Brien, G.
Opie, J.
Citation: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2001; 24(5):997-998
Publisher: Cambridge Univ Press
Issue Date: 2001
ISSN: 0140-525X
Statement of
Gerard O'Brien and Jon Opie
Abstract: O'Regan & Noë (O&N) fail to address adequately the two most historically important reasons for seeking to explain visual experience in terms of internal representations. They are silent about the apparently inferential nature of perception, and mistaken about the significance of the phenomenology accompanying dreams, hallucinations, and mental imagery.
Provenance: Published online by Cambridge University Press 18 Nov 2002
Rights: Copyright © 2001 Cambridge University Press
RMID: 0020012801
DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0149011X
Appears in Collections:Philosophy publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
O'Brien_37346.pdfPublished version52.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.