Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/38646
Type: Thesis
Title: Doctor of Nursing research portfolio : sedation of adult ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit / Judith Magarey
Other Titles: Sedation of adult ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit
The effectiveness of propofol versus midazolam for the sedation of adult ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICUs) Systematic review (Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence Based Nursing and Midwifery) ; no. 11.
Author: Magarey, Judith Mary, 1958-
Issue Date: 2002
School/Discipline: Dept. of Clinical Nursing
Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence Based Nursing and Midwifery
Abstract: Introduction to the topic -- Research reports: The effectiveness of propofol versus midazolam for the sedation of adult ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICUs) : a systematic review (completed 2000) -- The efficacy of an alternative sedation regimen for the sedation of adult ventilated patients in intensive care units (study not completed) -- A descriptive study to explore patients' memories of their stay in an intensive care unit (ICU) and to investigate the association of their memories with rhe sedation regimens used (completed 2001) -- A study to investigate the association between the critical illness sedation scale (CISS), independent clinical judgement and the bispectral index of EEG for the assessment of sedation of ventilated patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) -- Portfolio conclusion -- Publications: The effectiveness of propofol versus midazolam for the sedation of adult ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICUs) -- Propofol or midazolam - which is the best for the sedation of adult ventilated patients in intensive care units : a systematic review
Dissertation Note: Thesis (D.Nurs.) -- University of Adelaide, Dept. of Clinical Nursing, 2002
Subject: Sedatives Administration; Propofol; Midazolam; Intensive care nursing; Critical care medicine; Intensive care units; Artificial repiration
Description: Includes bibliographical references.
1 v. (various paging)
Provenance: Copyright material removed from digital thesis. See print copy in University of Adelaide Library for full text.
This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exception. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available or If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf248.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf15.61 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
PermissionsLibrary staff access only481.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
RestrictedLibrary staff access only19.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.