Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/39015
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBeaumont, N.-
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, N.-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationSouth Australian Geographical Journal, 2002; 101:1-13-
dc.identifier.issn1030-0481-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/39015-
dc.description.abstractApproaches to Integrated Coastal Management (ICM) taken by Victoria and Tasmania are examined. Legislation, coastal strategies (statutory), organisational structure, coordinated planning and management, and community involvement were found to be significant in the successful implementation of ICM in these two states. In this paper we discuss the implications for ICM in South Australia and conclude that the experience of Victoria and Tasmania provide useful directions for integration of coastal management in South Australia.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityNicole F. Morcom and Nick Harvey-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherRoyal Geographical Society of South Australia-
dc.rights© Royal Geographical Society of South Australia-
dc.subjectCoastal management-
dc.subjectSouth Australia-
dc.titleIntegrated coastal management in South Australia: lessons from Victoria & Tasmania-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidHarvey, N. [0000-0001-9769-5395]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Geography, Environment and Population publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.