Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/41590
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | James, H. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology, 2006; 24(1):12-13 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0258-414X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2219-6749 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/41590 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Bite mark analysis is unquestionably the most difficult, and contentious, work undertaken by forensic odontologists. Each injury must be assessed to determine if it was made by human or animal teeth, if the quality of the evidence allows presentation to a Court of Law, and if the pattern can be reasonably compared to a suspect dentition. Many injuries examined by forensic odontologists do not meet these criteria. A case is presented in which a Victim Statement could be corroborated, with evidence of good probative value. | - |
dc.description.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16783950 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Macquarie University School of Management | - |
dc.subject | Bite mark | - |
dc.subject | Forensic odontology | - |
dc.subject | Evidence | - |
dc.subject | Digital overlay | - |
dc.title | Good bite mark evidence: A case report | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 6 Dentistry publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.