Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/42271
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGolledge, J.en
dc.contributor.authorParr, A.en
dc.contributor.authorBoult, M.en
dc.contributor.authorMaddern, G.en
dc.contributor.authorFitridge, R.en
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Surgery, 2007; 245(2):326-333en
dc.identifier.issn0003-4932en
dc.identifier.issn1528-1140en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/42271-
dc.description.abstractTo assess the outcome of endovascular repair (EVAR) of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA, <or=5.5 mm maximum diameter) in Australia.Randomized trials have suggested that small AAAs should not be treated by open surgery. EVAR is associated with less perioperative mortality than open surgery for large AAAs. We assessed the outcome of EVAR of small AAAs as part of a national audit.ASERNIP-S carried out a prospective audit of EVAR performed between November 1999 and May 2001 in Australia. A total of 478 of the 961 patients entered underwent treatment of a small AAA. Data were collected regarding preoperative characteristics, procedural outcome, and intermediate success. Median follow-up was 3.2 years. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses.The 30-day mortality and technical success rates were 1.1% and 98%, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 29%. Survival was 84% and 52% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Primary, assisted primary, and secondary clinical success rates were 72%, 79%, and 82%, respectively, at 3 years. Reintervention rate was 11% at 3 years; however, 15% of patients continued to have significant aortic sac enlargement. Survival was reduced in patients considered unfit for general anesthesia (odds ratio = 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.8, P = 0.002) or those who had elevated preoperative serum creatinine (odds ratio = 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.0, P = 0.001).EVAR can be carried with good perioperative outcome in patients with small AAA; however, intermediate success is hampered by the need for reintervention and continued aortic sac enlargement. At present, widespread treatment of small AAAs by EVAR would appear inappropriate.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGolledge, Jonathan; Parr, Adam; Boult, Margaret; Maddern, Guy; Fitridge, Roberten
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen
dc.subjectHumans; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortography; Treatment Outcome; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Rate; Odds Ratio; Follow-Up Studies; Prospective Studies; Aged; Australia; Female; Maleen
dc.titleThe outcome of endovascular repair of small abdominal aortic aneurysmsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020070205en
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/01.sla.0000253965.95368.52en
dc.identifier.pubid49224-
pubs.library.collectionSurgery publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidBoult, M. [0000-0002-0517-9535]en
dc.identifier.orcidMaddern, G. [0000-0003-2064-181X]en
dc.identifier.orcidFitridge, R. [0000-0001-6258-5997]en
Appears in Collections:Surgery publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.