Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/43347
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrennan, D.-
dc.contributor.authorRoberts-Thomson, K.-
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, A.-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Dental Journal, 2007; 52(4):322-328-
dc.identifier.issn0045-0421-
dc.identifier.issn1834-7819-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/43347-
dc.descriptionThe definitive version can be found at www.blackwell-synergy.com-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Indigenous Australians have been reported in a range of studies to have worse health than non-Indigenous Australians. Among health care card holders, a financially disadvantaged group eligible for public-funded dental care, oral health may also be worse among Indigenous persons. The aims of this study were to examine the oral health of Indigenous compared to non-Indigenous adult public dental patients in terms of caries experience and periodontal status, controlling for age and gender of patient, type of care and geographic location. Methods: Patients were sampled randomly by state/territory dental services in 2001–2002. Dentists recorded oral health status at the initial visit of a course of care using written instructions. The samples were weighted in proportion to the numbers of public-funded dental patients for each state/territory. Results: Multivariate logistic regression showed that the presence of periodontal pockets of 6+ mm was higher (P < 0.05) among Indigenous compared to non-Indigenous patients (OR=2.24, 1.34–3.76), after controlling for age and gender of patients, type of care and geographic location. Multivariate negative binomial regression analysis (RR: rate ratio) controlling for age and gender of patients, type of care and geographic location indicated that Indigenous patients had higher numbers of decayed teeth (RR=1.42) and missing teeth (RR=1.44) but lower numbers of filled teeth (RR=0.51) compared to non-Indigenous patients (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the DMFT index, indicating similar cumulative past and present experience of dental caries for Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients. Conclusions: Indigenous adult public dental patients had worse oral health status than non-Indigenous patients, with a higher percentage of Indigenous patients having periodontal pockets 6+ mm, and Indigenous patients having more decayed and missing teeth. Indigenous patients lack both timely and appropriate preventive and treatment services.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDS Brennan, KF Roberts-Thomson, AJ Spencer-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAustralian Dental Assn Inc-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.tb00509.x-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectPeriodontal Pocket-
dc.subjectTooth Loss-
dc.subjectDental Caries-
dc.subjectEpidemiologic Methods-
dc.subjectDental Restoration, Permanent-
dc.subjectAdolescent-
dc.subjectAdult-
dc.subjectAged-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectPopulation Groups-
dc.subjectOral Health-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.titleOral health of Indigenous adult public dental patients in Australia-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.tb00509.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBrennan, D. [0000-0002-7888-0920]-
dc.identifier.orcidRoberts-Thomson, K. [0000-0001-7084-5541]-
dc.identifier.orcidSpencer, A. [0000-0002-3462-7456]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Dentistry publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.