Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Type: Journal article
Title: Live birth following day surgery reversal of female sterilisation in women older than 40 years: a realistic option in Australia?
Author: Petrucco, O.
Silber, S.
Gleeson, S.
Warnes, G.
Davies, M.
Citation: Medical Journal of Australia, 2007; 187(5):271-273
Publisher: Australasian Med Publ Co Ltd
Issue Date: 2007
ISSN: 0025-729X
Statement of
Oswald M Petrucco, Sherman J Silber, Sarah L Chamberlain, Graham M Warnes and Michael Davies
Abstract: Objective: To determine the live birth rate following surgical reversal of sterilisation in women aged 40 years and older. Design: Retrospective cohort study of pregnancy outcome following day surgery microsurgical reversal of sterilisation performed by two reproductive microsurgeons in the private sector. Setting and patients: 47 patients (aged 40 years or older) who had reversal of sterilisation performed between 1997 and 2005 in Adelaide, South Australia (n = 35), or the Infertility Centre of St Louis, Missouri, USA (n = 12). Main outcome measures: Independently audited live birth surviving the neonatal period. Results: Of the 47 patients on whom follow-up was obtainable from the two centres, 19 (40%) had a live birth, 7 had had only a first trimester miscarriage at the time of follow-up, and 21 (44%) had failed to conceive. Age at conception ranged between 40 and 47 years. Two women had two live births following surgery. The total direct costs (Australian dollars, adjusted to 2005) in Australia were $4850 per treatment, and $11 317 per live birth. The corresponding direct cost of a single cycle of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) in Australia has been estimated at $6940, with a cost per live birth of $97 884 for women aged 40–42 years and $182 794 for older women. Conclusion: Previously sterilised women wanting further pregnancy should be offered tubal surgery as an alternative to IVF, as it offers them the opportunity to have an entirely natural pregnancy. In settings where IVF is financially supported by government agencies or insurance, tubal reversal is a highly cost-effective strategy for the previously fertile woman.
Keywords: Humans; Pregnancy Outcome; Fertilization in Vitro; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Sterilization Reversal; Birth Rate; Retrospective Studies; Age Factors; Pregnancy; Adult; Middle Aged; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Missouri; South Australia; Female
Description: The document attached has been archived with permission from the editor of the Medical Journal of Australia. An external link to the publisher’s copy is included.
RMID: 0020072865
Published version:
Appears in Collections:Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_44501.pdfPublished version94.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.