Adelaide Research & Scholarship
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/45540
| Type: | Journal article |
| Title: | Antipodeans differ over advocates' immunity. |
| Author: | Bartie, S. |
| Citation: | Insurance Law Journal, 2007; 18(1):98-102 |
| Publisher: | LexisNexis Butterworths |
| Issue Date: | 2007 |
| ISSN: | 1030-2379 |
| Statement of Responsibility: | Susan Bartie |
| Abstract: | In Chamberlains v Lai, the NZ Supreme Court held that advocates' immunity no longer constituted a part of NZ common law - contrasts with the High Court of Australia's decision in D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid, where immunity was retained |
| Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 6 Law publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.