Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/46355
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKeevil, G.en
dc.contributor.authorPeakall, J.en
dc.contributor.authorBest, J.en
dc.contributor.authorAmos, K.en
dc.date.issued2006en
dc.identifier.citationMarine Geology, 2006; 229(3-4):241-257en
dc.identifier.issn0025-3227en
dc.identifier.issn1872-6151en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/46355-
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.abstractSubmarine channels have long been considered analogous to meandering fluvial channels due to their similar planform geometry, and this has given rise to strong analogies in terms of the fluid dynamics of these channel types. However, there is a paucity of direct measurements detailing the structure of velocity or sediment concentration, and nothing is known about the structure of secondary flow, within submarine channels. Within fluvial channels, secondary circulation has been shown to be an important control of erosion, deposition, lateral sediment transport and overall bend stability. This paper presents a series of experiments in which saline gravity currents flowed through a submerged, fixed-form, sinuous channel model. Ultrasonic Doppler velocity profiling provided high-resolution, three-dimensional visualisation of flow fields, thereby allowing the first quantitative visualisation of velocity profiles and secondary flows of a saline gravity current within a sinuous submarine channel. The same model was also used to measure the structure of flow within a subaerial channel, thereby providing a detailed comparison between a submarine and fluvial channel. The data reveal that secondary flow cells in submarine channels are best developed at bend apexes and that the basal component of the flow cell moves from the inside to the outside of the bend, in a reversed direction to that expected from models of fluvial bend flow. These results are of prime importance when assessing the validity of comparisons between submarine and fluvial channels, and the role of secondary flow cells in the migration and evolution of meander bends. This work demonstrates that the fundamental flow processes controlling the evolution and migration of submarine and fluvial channels may be very different, and suggest that the form and evolution of submarine channels may also show different properties to their fluvial counterparts.en
dc.description.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00253227en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevier Science BVen
dc.subjectphysical model; submarine channels; secondary flow; gravity currenten
dc.titleFlow structure in sinuous submarine channels: Velocity and turbulence structure of an experimental submarine channelen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020081594en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.margeo.2006.03.010en
dc.identifier.pubid42688-
pubs.library.collectionAustralian School of Petroleum publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidAmos, K. [0000-0003-0306-7588]en
Appears in Collections:Australian School of Petroleum publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.