Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||The Implications of Dying Cancer Patients' Talk on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders|
|Citation:||Qualitative Health Research, 2007; 17(4):442-455|
|Publisher:||Sage Publications Inc|
|Jaklin A. Eliott ; Ian N. Olver|
|Abstract:||Current medical emphasis on autonomy requires that patients be primary in authorizing do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, countermanding provision of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on terminally ill patients. The assumptions that patients make regarding CPR and DNR orders will influence their choices about them. Using discursive analysis, the authors examined the speech of 28 patients dying of cancer regarding the appropriateness of refraining from CPR or of instituting DNR orders. Most participants identified CPR as inappropriate in their circumstances, favoring institution of DNR orders. However, a minority drew on dominant construals of DNR orders and CPR to locate themselves outside the category of suitable candidates for DNR orders, thus justifying a preference for CPR—even though some had current DNR orders. Doctors’ and patients’ assessments of eligibility for DNR orders might not coincide, and when patient autonomy is presumed by patients to be determinant, discrepancies between patient expectations and instituted medical practice are inevitable.|
|Keywords:||Humans; Neoplasms; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Resuscitation Orders; Middle Aged; Terminally Ill; Patient Satisfaction; Advance Care Planning; South Australia; Female; Male; Interviews as Topic|
|Description:||© 2007 SAGE Publications.|
|Appears in Collections:||Psychology publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.